| Main Page (Log-in) | NewsForums | Gallery | Journals
Site Features
Main Page (Login)
Search
Forum
Gallery
Web Links for Art Ed
All Content by Date
Sections
Art News
At Massart
Art Education
Art Matters
Openings
Lesson Plans
Lists
Tutorials
Art + Technology
Workshops
Institutes
Site News


Weaving Technology and Multiple Intelligences into Science and Art PDF Print E-mail
Contributed by AECadmin   

Ellen Little has contributed a well planned lesson on Andy Goldsworthy "combining art, science, technology and  the theory of Multiple Intelligences."

From All Sides Now
Weaving Technology and Multiple Intelligences into Science and Art


By Carol Lach, Ellen Little, and Deborah Nazzaro
From Art and Science, Learning and Leading with Technology, March 2003
Reprinted at AEContent by permission
Copyright © ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education), 1.800.336.5191 (U.S. & Canada) or 1.541.302.3777 (Int’l), All rights reserved.


"The power of technology lies in the ability to merge it with the curriculum and create unique learning opportunities. When students can take a digital picture of an arrangement of objects from nature and then create an abstract rendition of it or superimpose a pattern on top of it, they learn content in the art and mathematics curricula. "

Open The Complete Lesson (PDF)

Ellen Little's Gallery of Student's responses to Andy Goldsworthy


Subject: Science, art, multiple intelligences

Audience: Teachers, technology coordinators,
library media specialists

Grade Level: 1–5 (Ages 6–11)

Technology: Internet/Web, digital
camera, and word processing, draw
and paint, and multimedia software

Standards: NETS•S 1, 3–5
www.iste.org/standards

Massachusetts State Curriculum Frameworks
Science MA 2.1–2.3, 2.5, 3.1;
Art MA 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.6, 3.7, 6.1,
6.2, 7.1, 9.4


Supplements:
Learning and Leading With Technology

The power of technology lies in the ability to merge it with the curriculum and create unique learning opportunities. When students can take a digital picture of an arrangement of objects from nature and then create an abstract rendition of it or superimpose a pattern on top of it, they learn content in the art and mathematics curricula. The opportunity to view an artist’s works on the Internet teaches art more effectively than trying to pass around a single book on that artist. That feeling of discovery students experience is more powerful than having material merely presented. They can proceed at their own pace and linger over the pictures that hold a special appeal for them.

The theory of multiple intelligences (MI) allows teachers to tap into the strengths of each student and to develop capabilities in novel ways. By weaving together technology, MI, and curriculum, we help students work in their own “magical learning environment” and accomplish the objectives of science and art units. Technology, by its very nature, uses and enhances the multiple intelligences. Bodily-kinesthetic skills are needed to use a keyboard and mouse; logical intelligence is needed for sequencing the steps in a program; and a visual-spatial sense is needed to process the information on the computer screen. When students assist their neighbors in the computer lab or work in pairs, the interpersonal intelligence comes into play. They use intrapersonal skills when they work individually to alter an image they have previously created collaboratively.

This project was designed to teach the patterns and structures in nature along with symmetry, contrast, balance, and shape in art.

Resources
Andy Goldsworthy
Center for Global Environmental Education

The Hemenway School

Smithsonian Magazine:
Searching for the window into nature's soul

Multiple Intelligences
American Education Network Corporation


Harvard University’s adult MI study site

Surfaquarium’s MI pages

Standards
Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks

National Educational Technology Standards
for Students --
Connecting Curriculum and Technology

References
Armstrong, T. (1993). Multiple intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

Goldsworthy, A. (1990). Andy Goldsworthy: A collaboration with nature. New York: Abrams, Inc.

Figure 2b. Samantha’s rendition.
REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION FROM ANDY GOLDSWORTHY.
Copyright © ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education), 1.800.336.5191 (U.S. & Canada) or 1.541.302.3777 (Int’l), All rights reserved.

Learning & Leading with Technology Volume 30 Number 6 36
Art & Science

Massachusetts Department of Education.
(1998–2001).
Massachusetts State Curriculum Frameworks
Malden, MA: Author.

Hadingham, J., Hargrave, S., Ciampa, J., Louie, C., Themson, C., & Stotsky, S.
(2001, February 17). Educational Technology Standards Draft, p. 3.

McKenzie, W. (2002). Multiple intelligences and instructional technology—A manual for every mind. Eugene, OR: ISTE.

Munroe, L. (1997). Nothing’s impossible. New York: Public Affairs.

Teele, S. (1995). The multiple intelligences school—A place for all students to succeed.Redlands, CA: Citrograph Printing.

 

< Prev   Next >
   Main Page (Login) arrow Lesson Plans arrow Weaving Technology and Multiple Intelligences into Science and Art